The International Spy Museum in Washington, D.C., says it is planning to revisit and overhaul an exhibit on torture after lawmakers argued the show was “sanitizing” depictions of torture and suggesting it was “efficient.”
BuzzFeed first reported that the museum would purpose to make modifications to its exhibit by March.
“The brand new exhibit will focus more broadly on the historical past of interrogation, to include both coercive strategies (physical and psychological) and non-coercive methods (akin to rapport building),” the museum’s president, Tamara Christian, wrote in a letter to 3 senators, obtained by BuzzFeed. “We additionally intend to add content material on scientific and technical innovations to detect deceit (to include a polygraph artifact), in addition to authorized definitions of torture.”
The senators — Dianne Feinstein, Martin Heinrich and Ron Wyden — wrote to the museum in December laying out their considerations concerning the message of the “interrogation exhibit.” They requested an replace on when modifications can be made.
“We have been deeply dismayed to study how the museum’s exhibit misrepresents the CIA’s torture program, sanitizing depictions of how methods have been applied and suggesting that torture is efficient in stopping terrorist assaults,” the senators wrote.
The three senators, who are all members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, added that that they had previously reviewed extra six million paperwork and wrote lengthy report displaying that torture “was not efficient, that it led to fabricated info, and that its makes use of undermined our safety and betrayed our values.”
The museum exhibit encompasses a video of a former CIA official who was involved in waterboarding terror suspects in the wake of 9/11, the place the ex-official stated, “This was a really profitable program. It protected the homeland and saved American lives,” in line with an NPR story last year.
“It has long been the consensus amongst specialists that torture is ineffective,” the senators’ letter continues. “But the Committee’s affirmation of this reality, advised by way of a historical past of the CIA program and based mostly on the CIA’s own inner data, goes unmentioned in the exhibit.”
Christian, the museum’s president, responded in her personal letter that the revised exhibit would come with a mention of the senators’ findings that torture was not an effective method of gathering info.
Museum Government Director Chris Costa said on Yahoo Information’ Skullduggery podcast on Monday that the exhibit has been “unfairly” known as a torture exhibit, when it covers interrogation as an entire.
“We targeted a bit of bit more than perhaps we should always have on the coercive strategies,” Costa stated. “We need to speak about non-coercive interrogation. We speak about torture as a result of torture is a part of the interrogation history, all through intelligence history. What we need to do is be sure that yet one more time that we get every part right.”